Intercultural Communication Stumbling Blocks By Samovar,...

Intercultural Communication Introduction According to the articles Intercultural communication stumbling blocks by Barna and Intercultural communication by Samovar, Porter, McDaniel Roy, describe the various challenges that are faced between communications of two individuals who come from different cultures. Notably, challenges that are faced by different people who come from different cultures exist due to the problem of the difference between the cultural norms. For instance, what is acceptable in the United States as a form of communication is entirely different from what is acceptable in Japan as a form of communication. Additionally, challenges that exist in intercultural communication may be due to the prejudices that individuals†¦show more content†¦The Vietnamese student thought that Americans are superficial for the way talk as well as smiling too much. On the other hand, An American Girl viewed that the international students most of them were quite unfriendly. According to this article, there are stumbl ing blocks that exist in intercultural communication. First is the language whereby there may exist different interpretation concerning a particular vocabulary or sentence (Barna, 1994). For instance, according to this article, when a Japanese hear that ‘won’t you have some tea? He may respond ‘no meaning that he is interested in taking tea which may mean to an American person that he is not interested in taking the tea. Thus, this may act as a stumbling block. The second stumbling block is nonverbal signs and symbols. In case there exist different meaning of the non-verbal signs and symbols, communication is hindered. Summary of Prejudice in Intercultural Communication This article describes the way individuals react negatively to other people without any factual material or direct contact. In other words, it describes the way some people have a negative attitude towards other people from a particular culture due to the prejudice. According to this article, individuals usually practice prejudice towards other people due to four reasons. First is due to their utilitarian or adjustment function. In this case, they intend to hold the

How the Rediscovery of the Works of Aristotle Challenged the Church Free Essays

Rediscovery of the Works of Aristotle challenged the Church in several ways as it triggered the Scientific Renaissance. This was characterized by many inventions and discoveries. It is the discoveries that challenged the Church then and continue to do even today. We will write a custom essay sample on How the Rediscovery of the Works of Aristotle Challenged the Church or any similar topic only for you Order Now Some of these discoveries caused people to start doubting what the church and Christianity beliefs had made them to believe. The developments in the study of the universe especially brought contradictions in what was discovered and what the Church Taught. An example is that while it was discovered that the sun did not move, the Bible which was very fundamental to the Church had verses that implied that the Sun moved. Developments in Astronomy a result of the rediscovery of the works of Aristotle are hence an example of its challenge to the Church (Kretzmann Stump, 2001). What Scholasticism is and how it attempted to Reconcile Faith with Reason Scholasticism is a method of teaching where learners are encouraged to reason dialectically. This tool for learning enables the learners to learn how to argue with those holding beliefs and ideas that are different from theirs hence are able to persuade them to join them (Alvarez, 1971). The sole objective of Scholasticism was to resolve ideas that were contradicting or conflicting. This is because even though the ideas and beliefs were different, they shared some common principles which brought out the conflicts as individuals argued on which ones were right hence in an attempt to find the answers, Scholasticism was invented. It attempted to reconcile reason and faith by looking using Aristotle’s philosophy of human reasoning to explain the Christian faith that was characterized by supernatural contents that could not be easily understood. It sought to bring together the wisdom of the Christianity religion and that of the Aristotle and other Greeks. The movement sought to integrate the two, that is the secular beliefs and Christian beliefs so as to come up with an ordered system used reason to explain faith. 2. How Renaissance Altered Views of Humanity and the Human Relationship with God prevalent during the Middle Ages. Renaissance period which was characterized by numerous cultural changes altered views of humanity in many ways. It emphasized so much on reasoning that some views of humanity that initially were believed to be against humanity became morally right due to reasoning. Most of the issues that are perceived to be inhuman such as suicide for example have their root s in this period. This is because it was during this period that individuals reasoned that actions such as suicide were the better option (Alvarez, 1971). For example it was reasoned that it was better for old people to commit suicide than to continue living as they suffer the complications that come with old age. The stoics were amongst the humanists who supported suicide in the event that it was done under such circumstances. Suicide was now seen and described as good death as it relieved younger people the burden of taking care of or killing individuals who were too old. Humanists such as Plato and Aristotle argued against suicide claiming that no circumstances could justify it as it left the responsibilities of those who killed themselves abandoned and denied the community a citizen who could contribute to its development. Other philosophers such as Jewish and Christian religions however believed that such action were against God’s desire and human good as they affected human responsibility to god as he created life to be preserved. Philosophers such as Michel de Montaigne even challenged condemnation of suicide arguing that it was a moral thing to do under certain circumstances and that it should be perceived as a religious belief but as a matter of choice as every human being had the freedom to choose. During the middle ages, the prevalence of human relationship with God was very low. This can be attributed to the many scientific discoveries that challenged the church and its beliefs hence deviating people’s beliefs from its teachings. The many philosophers and their theories also caused confusion causing their relationship with God not to be as strong as it was before. The Humanists, what they said and how they Contributed to Modern Education. Humanists scholars who challenged some of the philosophers shaped and established intellectual landscape from the middle age period to the present day. These philosophers include Thomas More and Niccolo Machiavelli who criticized contemporary government and some of the secular beliefs. Their theories and teachings revived the Roman’s and Greek’s way of thinking and ideas. The challenging of Aristotelian status quo by humanists such as Martin Luther led to the introduction of faith and justification ideas that were new, liberal and radical. The justification theory is very crucial to modern education as many fields of study call for justification to be made before they can be accepted. This goes for research too. 3. How Dangerous Beauty Reflects Values Dominant in Venice and how it depicts relationship patterns between man and women. The fact that Marco was discouraged by his family from veronica even though he loved her implies that individuals in Venice value wealth more than any other thing. Veronica’s decision to become a courtesan in an effort to get money that would support her and her mother reflects the same value of the Venice individuals preferring wealth so much that they could even compromise their principles. The fact that Veronica was not the only one and that even her mother and grandmother had done the same thing implies that prostitution is a dominant thing in Venice especially with men of high social standing. This value has negative impact on the relationship between men and women. This goes especially for the married couples. We observe that Marco’s marriage started experiencing problems as he had no intimate relationship with his wife once he started being with Veronica. The marriage eventually broke up. It can be concluded that both the values discussed above negatively affect the relationship between men and women. 4. How Lady Jane show the dynastic and religious conflicts prominent in England in the 16th Century The two weeks that Lady Jane ruled England and her execution brought out the existing dynastic and religious conflicts prominent in the Kingdom. We observe she was not the right person to inherit the throne from Edward VI. The only reason Edward chose her to succeed him and not Mary his half sister who was the rightful heiress at the time was because just like he was, Jane was a staunch protestant while Mary was Catholic. There seems to have been a religious conflict as the English nobles did not want the throne to be given to a catholic. Mary went away and gathered herself support. She later came back and denounced Jane as the Queen of England. According to the law she was the rightful heiress hence the parliament could do nothing but proclaim her as the Queen. Mary then imprisoned Jane and her husband. This brings out the dynasty conflicts in England within the Royal families. When Mary married a Roman catholic Prince from Spain called Philip, the protestants in England rebelled and carried out demonstrations as they were against catholic religion. Some even called fore the restoration of Jane as the Queen. This made Mary to execute her so as to repress any future rebellions and unrest within the kingdom. It was observed that this marked the climax of religious and dynasty conflicts in the kingdom at the time as Protestants did not want to be ruled by Catholics while the Catholics did not want to lose their grip on the throne. It can hence be concluded that dynasty and religious conflicts were prominent in England during the 16th Century. 5. The Hundred Schools of Thought, their chief Theorists, and what they said. Especially Confucius. The hundred schools of thought were schools and philosophers that sprang up and got established from the period 770-221B. C. E in China. These schools flourished during an era that the country was experiencing culture and intellectual expansion. The thoughts that were developed during this time influence the country up to now. The schools developed were confucianism, school of law, languages, Moism , amongst several others. The theorists of confucianism were Xunzi who argued that humans are not born good but that goodness is a virtue that is developed with time through training of ones conducts and desire. Mengzi another confucianism theorists argued that every individual had a responsibility and obligation to every one else in the society and not just to those they were acquainted with. He explained that one had to be careful in their action as they affected many people. Kongzi argued that ideal human beings were those that were gentlemen. He also explained social stratification and political governance could only exist peacefully by ethical values. He argued that good leader needed to be virtues in order for them to rule well. He added that the best relationship was achieved when leaders remained leaders while subjects accordingly remained so. 6. Buddhist Thought. The Buddhist Thought is based on three fundamental principles namely impermanence, selflessness and unsatisfactoriness. The thought is that all; things in life come from one source and eventually go back to the same source. It explains that everything in the world is connected to each other and none can exist independently or occurs apart from the rest. Its view is that everything in the world undergoes transformation and some change during its existence. This according to the thought is that things do not cease to exist, they only change their state through transformation and exist in other forms. This thought is what explains the religion’s belief in rebirth. 7. Historians talk about the revolution of the 11th Century, which launch a series of conflicts between Church and state. What form did these conflicts take? The 11th century was characterized by many conflicts between the Church and state. These conflicts were mainly between kings and Popes. As both parties sought to have more power than the other, conflicts arose. Initially monarchs had ruled both the throne and the church as it was believed that they had divine right. But then, in contrast the pope was believed to be God’s vicar on earth hence having the divine authority from God to the state. (Elliott, 1877). This resulted to the church having more power in the West but as secular kingdoms flourished, power struggle between the two sprang up. The conflict was between the secular ideologies of the state and the sacred ideologies of the church. Eventually the church lost some of its powers to the state. How to cite How the Rediscovery of the Works of Aristotle Challenged the Church, Papers

Stakeholder Management and Communications Plan - MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Stakeholder Management and Communications Plan. Answer: The project management documentation is helpful for the development of the specific activities of the project integration and development (Kerzner 2013). The proper documentation would be helpful for the deployment of the project activities for the integration of the simplified processing and development. The analysis would be helpful for the development of the effective processing and the formation of the plan for the project operations. The project of Site Demolition would comprise of the role of the effective development of the processes and integration (Burke 2013). The project would use the various project management processes for the development of the systematic tools and development. The following assignment is a project management plan that comprise of all the major documentation requirements for the project. The integration of the various types of documentation would be formed for ensuring a sound process system is formed for the project. The various plans made in this document are organisational/staffing plan, stakeholder management and communications plan, resourcing plan, program schedule, budget estimation plan, quality management plan, work health safety plan, procurement and logistics plan, and risk management plan. These plans would be formed into a simple document used for the development of the effective processing of the project. Organisational/Staffing Plan The project resource planning for the project is Goyder Street - Site Demolition is shown in the table below, Human Resource Roles and Responsibility Project Engineer The project engineer is responsible for the major activities of the project of site demolishing. Site Foreman The site foreman is responsible for the development of the site of the Goyder Street for the demolition activities Plant operator The plant operator is responsible for the management of the operations at the plant of the drainage works and water works General laborer The general laborer is responsible for all the activities of the project construction including the general works at the site such as removal of the waste or laying the basic concrete ground Principal Surveyor Principal surveyor is responsible for the development of the major survey of the site and analysis of the requirements Senior Surveyor The senior surveyor would take care of the surveys of the site and it would form the development of the effective surveys accurate for the project Surveyor The surveyor would comprise of general surveyor responsible for the analysis of the various data and information required for the development of the project Survey Draftsperson The draftsperson would complete the drafting of the survey results for easing the projects data. Survey Assistant The survey assistant supports all the activities of the surveys by doing all the activities. Arborist The Arborist would be responsible for the uprooting of the trees so that it does not harm the integrity of the trees. In this way, the trees would be placed successfully. Hygienist The Hygienist is responsible for the development of the effective processing and development of the effective processing. The analysis of the processes would be helpful for the formation of the system development. Asbestos Removalist Supervisor The Asbestos is harmful mineral hazardous to human health and the supervisor is responsible for the development of the process of removing these from the ground. Asbestos Removalist Labourer The laborer would support the activities of the removing of the asbestos. The manual work required for removing the Asbestos would be done by the laborers. Senior Environmental Consultant The senior environmental consultant would be responsible for the analysis of the effective processing and development. Environmental Consultant The environmental consultant would be responsible for the management of the environmental activities. The demolition would impact the environment of the site and the consultant would ensure that the environment does not face any major harm from the project activities. Structural Engineer The structural engineer is responsible for the development of the effective processing and integration. The analysis would help in the development of the major demolition activities of the project. Stakeholder Management and Communications Plan The stakeholder management plan for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street is developed for managing the development of the effective and improved services for the management of the stakeholders of the project (Larson and Gray 2013). The stakeholder management plan includes the identification of the stakeholders, key stakeholders, and the stakeholder analysis. Identification of the Stakeholders: The identification of the stakeholders is the primary step of the stakeholder management plan. The project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street would comprise a number of stakeholders such as the project team of Project Engineer, Site Foreman, Plant operator, General laborer, Principal Surveyor, Senior Surveyor, Surveyor, Survey Draftsperson, Survey Assistant, Arborist, Hygienist, Asbestos Removalist Supervisor, Asbestos Removalist Laborer, Senior Environmental Consultant, Environmental Consultant, and Structural Engineer, project client, government, site owner, and local community. Key Stakeholders: The key stakeholders of the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street can be realized by the forming the specific analysis of the major stakeholders of the project. The key stakeholders have large impact on the operations of the project and all the other stakeholders of the project would communicate with the key stakeholders for any situation. Stakeholder Analysis: The stakeholder analysis is done for categorizing the stakeholders in terms of their interest and influence on the project. The stakeholder analysis for Site Demolition at Goyder Street would comprise of forming the classification of the project stakeholders by assigning them a value of 1-5 for power and interest. The analysis has been based on the power and interest and it would be depicted by a matrix. The high power and high interest stakeholders are the key stakeholders of the project that takes managerial decisions for the project. Communication Plan The communication plan for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street is made for the development of the effective transfer of the information from one level of the project hierarchy to the other level. The effective communication is very important as it would be helpful for the achievement of the project success (Serra and Kunc 2015). The communication plan includes selection of communication approach, analysis of communication requirements, review of the communication constraints, communication methods and technologies, and development of communication matrix. Selection of Communication Approach: The selection of the communication approach for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street is very important as it would help in deploying effective communication management plan. The approach would help in classifying whether the communication plan would be implemented successfully over the period of time. Analysis of Communication Requirements: The analysis of communication requirement for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street would comprise of developing the effective and improved development model. The communication requirement analysis would be helpful for carrying out the deployment of the improved processes of the communication plan developed. Review of the Communication Constraints: The review of the communication constraints would be helpful for the development of the effective processing and integration. The communication constraints include the various barriers or noises (disturbances) that hinder or limit the process of communication for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street. Communication Methods and Technologies: The communication methods that can be used in the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street are verbal communication face to face, documentation and reports, email conversation, use of telephones, meetings, and use of social media. These methods and technologies would assist the ease of the information transfer and provide scope for the development of the effective communication in the organization. Development of Communication Matrix: The communication matrix is developed for the deployment of the communication requirement analysis for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street. The communication matrix accounts the deployment of the specific plan of communication for various stakeholders. Communication Terms Communication Medium Frequency Audience Objective Project Kick off Meeting Face to Face Once Project Sponsor Project Team Stakeholders To initiate the project activities Project Plan Scheduling Meeting Face to face Social Media Group Messaging Once Project Team To schedule the project plan Risk Management Planning Conference Call Email Monthly Project Technical Staff To explain the project risk management plan Project Status Report discussion Documents Emails Weekly Project Manager Project Team Project Client To acknowledge the project progress Closure Face to Face Once Project Sponsor Project Manager To close the project A Resourcing Plan The project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street is basically a construction type project and it requires the development of the activities for safely demolition of 65, Goyder Street site. The resources required for the project consists of both human and material resources. The integration of these resources would be developed for forming the smooth operations of the project activities (Mok, Shen and Yang 2015). The various human resources for the project are Project Engineer, Site Foreman, Plant operator, General labourer, Principal Surveyor, Senior Surveyor, Surveyor, Survey Draftsperson, Survey Assistant, Arborist, Hygienist, Asbestos Removalist Supervisor, Asbestos Removalist Labourer, Senior Environmental Consultant, Environmental Consultant, and Structural Engineer. These are the human resources required for the activities of the project and it would be required for integrating the effective project plan development. The material resources for the project are Utility, Tip truck rigid and dog/semi, Bulldozer, 2 cubic metre rubber tyres front?end loader, Excavator, Backhoe and front?end loader, Trenching machine, vibratory roller, Hydro excavation truck, Compressor including hoses and tools, 50mm petrol driven pump, Bob cat, Crane, and Grader. The resource usage plan is given in the table below, Resource Name Work Project Engineer 136 hrs Preparation of Project Plans 40 hrs Liaison and Approvals from all Authorities 8 hrs Liaison and Co?ordination with adjoining work sites / residential / business dwellings 8 hrs Approvals and Fees for Required Technical Support 8 hrs Unexpected Finds 8 hrs Demolition of Buildings 56 hrs Project is Closed 8 hrs Site Foreman 56 hrs Site establishment maintenance site office and amenities 24 hrs Works by ActewAGL 16 hrs Works by the Contractor 16 hrs Plant operator 160 hrs Compliance and Audit Testing as Directed by the Principal's Authorised Person 24 hrs Works by the Water Authority to existing sewer services (ICON) 16 hrs Works by the Contractor on existing water services, excluding works by the Sewer Authority 16 hrs Removal of all internal in ground water services 24 hrs Works by ActewAGL 16 hrs Works by the Contractor 16 hrs Works by Telstra 16 hrs Works by the Contractor 16 hrs Excavate and stockpile spoil at AEC 16 hrs General labourer 264 hrs Removal of Concrete Kerbs (all Types) 16 hrs Removal of Paths and Driveways 16 hrs Removal and Stockpiling topsoil on site 24 hrs Disposal of Spoil Material Off Site 16 hrs Imported Fill 16 hrs Sewer 16 hrs Stormwater 16 hrs Gas 16 hrs Electricity 16 hrs Water 16 hrs Telecommunication 16 hrs Removal of all internal in ground sewer services 24 hrs Removal of all internal in ground stormwater services 16 hrs Remove and dispose of pipes, valves and vent lines 16 hrs Remove and dispose of UST 24 hrs Principal Surveyor 32 hrs Survey Control 16 hrs Environmental Reporting and Approvals including Liaison and Co?ordination with the Principals Environmental Consultant 16 hrs Senior Surveyor 24 hrs Site establishment maintenance site office and amenities 24 hrs Survey Assistant 16 hrs Survey Control 16 hrs Arborist 32 hrs Removal of Tree 16 hrs Removal of Pavement 16 hrs Hygienist 64 hrs Protection of the Works 16 hrs Works by ActewAGL 16 hrs Works by the Contractor 16 hrs Air Monitoring 16 hrs Asbestos Removalist Supervisor 72 hrs Works by the Contractor on existing sewer services, excluding works by the Sewer Authority 16 hrs Hazardous materials, lead paint, PCBs, SMFs ODS 24 hrs Removal and disposal of all hazardous materials 32 hrs Asbestos Removalist Labourer 88 hrs Removal of Pavement 16 hrs Works by the Sewer Authority to existing sewer services (ICON) 16 hrs Hazardous materials, lead paint, PCBs, SMFs ODS 24 hrs Removal and disposal of all hazardous materials 32 hrs Senior Environmental Consultant 72 hrs Preparation of Construction and Environmental Management Plan 16 hrs Environmental Reporting and Approvals including Liaison and Co?ordination with the Principals Environmental Consultant 16 hrs Environmental Clearances to proceed with the demolition works 24 hrs Establish and maintain environmental controls 16 hrs Environmental Consultant 96 hrs Environmental Reporting and Approvals including Liaison and Co?ordination with the Principals Environmental Consultant 16 hrs Compliance and Audit Testing as Directed by the Principal's Authorised Person 24 hrs Air Monitoring 16 hrs Environmental Clearances to proceed with the demolition works 24 hrs Establish and maintain environmental controls 16 hrs Structural Engineer 264 hrs Preparation of Construction and Environmental Management Plan 16 hrs Developing Traffic Management Plan 24 hrs Traffic Clearance from authority 8 hrs Implementing Traffic Management Plan 16 hrs Traffic is Managed 8 hrs Backfilling Under Roads, Paths and Driveways 24 hrs Validation sampling of stockpile 8 hrs Demolition of Buildings 56 hrs Retaining Walls (Brick) 24 hrs Courtyard Walls (Brick) 24 hrs Concrete Stairs 24 hrs Light Poles, Light Bollards, log barriers Signs etc 16 hrs Gas Meter Brick Enclosure 16 hrs Utility 4 Removal and Stockpiling topsoil on site 1 Works by the Sewer Authority to existing sewer services (ICON) 1 Works by the Contractor on existing sewer services, excluding works by the Sewer Authority 1 Bitumen and Straw Mulching 1 Tip truck rigid and dog/semi 4 Works by the Sewer Authority to existing sewer services (ICON) 1 Works by the Contractor on existing sewer services, excluding works by the Sewer Authority 1 Grassing 1 Remove and dispose of UST 1 Bulldozer 3 Removal of Paths and Driveways 1 Removal of Existing Fences 1 Demolition of Buildings 1 2 cubic metre rubber tyred front?end loader 6 Removal of Tree 1 Imported Fill 1 Backfilling Under Roads, Paths and Driveways 1 Site topsoil to grass areas 1 Additional validation sampling 1 Additional spoil disposal 1 Excavator 5 Removal of Pavement 1 Fence Type T 1 Dryland Grass 1 Excavate and stockpile spoil at AEC 1 Removal and disposal of stockpile spoil 1 Trenching machine 2 Topsoil 1 Remove and dispose of pipes, valves and vent lines 1 vibratory roller 4 Disposal of Spoil Material Off Site 1 Removal of all internal in ground sewer services 1 Removal of all internal in ground stormwater services 1 Bitumen and Straw Mulching 1 Hydro excavation truck 3 Works by the Water Authority to existing sewer services (ICON) 1 Works by the Contractor on existing water services, excluding works by the Sewer Authority 1 Removal of all internal in ground water services 1 Compressor including hoses and tools 7 Sewer 1 Stormwater 1 Gas 1 Electricity 1 Water 1 Telecommunication 1 Fence Type T 1 Bob cat 1 Backfilling Under Roads, Paths and Driveways 1 Crane 3 Removal of Pavement 1 Removal of Concrete Kerbs (all Types) 1 Topsoiling (Type C) 1 Grader 4 Works by ActewAGL 1 Works by the Contractor 1 Works by Telstra 1 Works by the Contractor 1 A Program Schedule The project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street initiates on 1st December, 2017 and project runs for 131 working days. The project consists of seven main phases namely Preliminaries, Provision for Traffic, Earthworks, Underground Services, Incidentals, Landscape, and Demolition. The project ends on 1st June, 2018 making a total of 182 days in total. The project schedule for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street is given in the table below, WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Resource Names 0 GOYDER STREET - SITE DEMOLITION 131 days Fri 12/1/17 Fri 6/1/18 1 PRELIMINARIES 20 days Fri 12/1/17 Thu 12/28/17 1.1 Site establishment maintenance site office and amenities 3 days Fri 12/1/17 Tue 12/5/17 Senior Surveyor, Site Foreman 1.2 Survey Control 2 days Wed 12/6/17 Thu 12/7/17 2 Principal Surveyor, Survey Assistant 1.3 Preparation of Project Plans 5 days Fri 12/8/17 Thu 12/14/17 3 Project Engineer 1.4 Preparation of Construction and Environmental Management Plan 2 days Fri 12/15/17 Mon 12/18/17 4 Senior Environmental Consultant, Structural Engineer 1.5 Liaison and Approvals from all Authorities 1 day Tue 12/19/17 Tue 12/19/17 5 Project Engineer 1.6 Liaison and Co?ordination with adjoining work sites / residential / business dwellings 1 day Wed 12/20/17 Wed 12/20/17 6 Project Engineer 1.7 Environmental Reporting and Approvals including Liaison and Co?ordination with the Principals Environmental Consultant 2 days Thu 12/21/17 Fri 12/22/17 7 Senior Environmental Consultant, Principal Surveyor, Environmental Consultant 1.8 Approvals and Fees for Required Technical Support 1 day Mon 12/25/17 Mon 12/25/17 8 Project Engineer 1.9 Compliance and Audit Testing as Directed by the Principal's Authorised Person 3 days Tue 12/26/17 Thu 12/28/17 9 Plant operator, Environmental Consultant 2 PROVISION FOR TRAFFIC 7 days Wed 12/6/17 Thu 12/14/17 2.1 Developing Traffic Management Plan 3 days Wed 12/6/17 Fri 12/8/17 2 Structural Engineer 2.2 Traffic Clearance from authority 1 day Mon 12/11/17 Mon 12/11/17 12 Structural Engineer 2.3 Implementing Traffic Management Plan 2 days Tue 12/12/17 Wed 12/13/17 13 Structural Engineer 2.4 Traffic is Managed 1 day Thu 12/14/17 Thu 12/14/17 14 Structural Engineer 3 EARTHWORKS 17 days Fri 12/29/17 Mon 1/22/18 3.1 Protection of the Works 2 days Fri 12/29/17 Mon 1/1/18 10,15 Hygienist 3.2 Clearing and grubbing 2 days Tue 1/2/18 Wed 1/3/18 3.2.1 Removal of Tree 2 days Tue 1/2/18 Wed 1/3/18 17 Arborist, 2 cubic metre rubber tyred front?end loader[1] 3.3 Removal of Pavement 2 days Thu 1/4/18 Fri 1/5/18 19 Arborist, Asbestos Removalist Labourer, Excavator[1], Crane[1] 3.4 Removal of Concrete Kerbs (all Types) 2 days Mon 1/8/18 Tue 1/9/18 20 General labourer, Crane[1] 3.5 Removal of Paths and Driveways 2 days Wed 1/10/18 Thu 1/11/18 21 General labourer, Bulldozer[1] 3.6 Removal and Stockpiling topsoil 3 days Fri 1/12/18 Tue 1/16/18 3.6.1 Removal and Stockpiling topsoil on site 3 days Fri 1/12/18 Tue 1/16/18 22 General labourer, Utility[1] 3.7 Disposal of Spoil Material Off Site 2 days Wed 1/17/18 Thu 1/18/18 24 General labourer, vibratory roller[1] 3.8 Imported Fill 2 days Fri 1/19/18 Mon 1/22/18 25 General labourer, 2 cubic metre rubber tyred front?end loader[1] 4 UNDERGROUND SERVICES 43 days Tue 1/2/18 Thu 3/1/18 4.1 Excavation Backfilling 27 days Tue 1/2/18 Wed 2/7/18 4.1.1 Backfilling Under Roads, Paths and Driveways 3 days Tue 1/2/18 Thu 1/4/18 17 Structural Engineer,2 cubic metre rubber tyred front?end loader[1], Bob cat[1] 4.1.2 Existing Services Location 12 days Tue 1/23/18 Wed 2/7/18 4.1.2.1 Sewer 2 days Tue 1/23/18 Wed 1/24/18 29,26 General labourer, Compressor including hoses and tools[1] 4.1.2.2 Stormwater 2 days Thu 1/25/18 Fri 1/26/18 31 General labourer,Compressor including hoses and tools[1] 4.1.2.3 Gas 2 days Mon 1/29/18 Tue 1/30/18 32 General labourer, Compressor including hoses and tools[1] 4.1.2.4 Electricity 2 days Wed 1/31/18 Thu 2/1/18 33 General labourer, Compressor including hoses and tools[1] 4.1.2.5 Water 2 days Fri 2/2/18 Mon 2/5/18 34 General labourer, Compressor including hoses and tools[1] 4.1.2.6 Telecommunication 2 days Tue 2/6/18 Wed 2/7/18 35 General labourer, Compressor including hoses and tools[1] 4.2 Sewerage 7 days Thu 2/8/18 Fri 2/16/18 4.2.1 Works by the Sewer Authority (ICON) 4 days Thu 2/8/18 Tue 2/13/18 4.2.1.1 Works by the Sewer Authority to existing sewer services (ICON) 2 days Thu 2/8/18 Fri 2/9/18 36 Asbestos Removalist Labourer, Tip truck rigid and dog/semi[1],Utility[1] 4.2.1.2 Works by the Contractor on existing sewer services, excluding works by the Sewer Authority 2 days Mon 2/12/18 Tue 2/13/18 39 Asbestos Removalist Supervisor, Tip truck rigid and dog/semi[1],Utility[1] 4.2.2 Removal of all internal in ground sewer services 3 days Wed 2/14/18 Fri 2/16/18 40 General labourer, vibratory roller[1] 4.3 Stormwater Drainage 2 days Mon 2/19/18 Tue 2/20/18 4.3.1 Removal of all internal in ground stormwater services 2 days Mon 2/19/18 Tue 2/20/18 41 General labourer, vibratory roller[1] 4.4 Water Supply Mains 7 days Wed 2/21/18 Thu 3/1/18 4.4.1 Works by the Water Authority (ICON) 4 days Wed 2/21/18 Mon 2/26/18 4.4.1.1 Works by the Water Authority to existing sewer services (ICON) 2 days Wed 2/21/18 Thu 2/22/18 43 Hydro excavation truck[1], Plant operator 4.4.1.2 Works by the Contractor on existing water services, excluding works by the Sewer Authority 2 days Fri 2/23/18 Mon 2/26/18 46 Hydro excavation truck[1], Plant operator 4.4.2 Removal of all internal in ground water services 3 days Tue 2/27/18 Thu 3/1/18 47 Hydro excavation truck[1], Plant operator 5 INCIDENTALS 8 days Fri 3/2/18 Tue 3/13/18 5.1 Fencing 3 days Fri 3/2/18 Tue 3/6/18 5.1.1 Fence Type T 3 days Fri 3/2/18 Tue 3/6/18 48 Compressor including hoses and tools[1], Excavator[1] 5.2 Removal of Existing Fences 2 days Wed 3/7/18 Thu 3/8/18 51 Bulldozer[1] 5.3 Power Supply Disconnection 4 days Fri 3/2/18 Wed 3/7/18 5.3.1 Works by ActewAGL 2 days Fri 3/2/18 Mon 3/5/18 48 Grader[1], Plant operator 5.3.2 Works by the Contractor 2 days Tue 3/6/18 Wed 3/7/18 54 Grader[1], Plant operator 5.4 Comms Supply Disconnection 4 days Thu 3/8/18 Tue 3/13/18 5.4.1 Works by Telstra 2 days Thu 3/8/18 Fri 3/9/18 51,55 Grader[1], Plant operator 5.4.2 Works by the Contractor 2 days Mon 3/12/18 Tue 3/13/18 57 Grader[1], Plant operator 5.5 Gas Supply Disconnection 4 days Tue 3/6/18 Fri 3/9/18 5.5.1 Works by ActewAGL 2 days Tue 3/6/18 Wed 3/7/18 54 Hygienist, Site Foreman 5.5.2 Works by the Contractor 2 days Thu 3/8/18 Fri 3/9/18 60 Hygienist, Site Foreman 6 LANDSCAPE 18 days Fri 3/2/18 Tue 3/27/18 6.1 Topsoil 3 days Fri 3/2/18 Tue 3/6/18 48 Trenching machine[1] 6.2 Site topsoil to grass areas 2 days Wed 3/7/18 Thu 3/8/18 63 2 cubic metre rubber tyred front?end loader[1] 6.3 Topsoiling (Type C) 4 days Fri 3/9/18 Wed 3/14/18 64 Crane[1] 6.4 Grassing 3 days Thu 3/15/18 Mon 3/19/18 65 Tip truck rigid and dog/semi[1] 6.5 Dryland Grass 2 days Tue 3/20/18 Wed 3/21/18 66 Excavator[1] 6.6 Bitumen and Straw Mulching 4 days Thu 3/22/18 Tue 3/27/18 67 Utility[1], vibratory roller[1] 7 DEMOLITION 47 days Wed 3/28/18 Thu 5/31/18 7.1 Hazardous Materials Removal 3 days Wed 3/28/18 Fri 3/30/18 7.1.1 Hazardous materials, lead paint, PCBs, SMFs ODS 3 days Wed 3/28/18 Fri 3/30/18 68 Asbestos Removalist Labourer, Asbestos Removalist Supervisor 7.2 Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) 9 days Mon 4/2/18 Thu 4/12/18 7.2.1 Removal and disposal of all hazardous materials 4 days Mon 4/2/18 Thu 4/5/18 71 Asbestos Removalist Labourer, Asbestos Removalist Supervisor 7.2.2 Air Monitoring 2 days Fri 4/6/18 Mon 4/9/18 73 Environmental Consultant, Hygienist 7.2.3 Environmental Clearances to proceed with the demolition works 3 days Tue 4/10/18 Thu 4/12/18 74 Environmental Consultant, Senior Environmental Consultant 7.3 Underground Fuel Storage Tank 15 days Fri 4/13/18 Thu 5/3/18 7.3.1 Establish and maintain environmental controls 2 days Fri 4/13/18 Mon 4/16/18 75 Environmental Consultant, Senior Environmental Consultant 7.3.2 Excavate and stockpile spoil at AEC 2 days Tue 4/17/18 Wed 4/18/18 77 Plant operator, Excavator[1] 7.3.3 Remove and dispose of pipes, valves and vent lines 2 days Thu 4/19/18 Fri 4/20/18 78 General labourer, Trenching machine[1] 7.3.4 Remove and dispose of UST 3 days Mon 4/23/18 Wed 4/25/18 79 General labourer, Tip truck rigid and dog/semi[1] 7.3.5 Validation sampling of stockpile 1 day Thu 4/26/18 Thu 4/26/18 80 Structural Engineer 7.3.6 Removal and disposal of stockpile spoil 2 days Fri 4/27/18 Mon 4/30/18 81 Excavator[1] 7.3.7 Additional validation sampling 1 day Tue 5/1/18 Tue 5/1/18 82 2 cubic metre rubber tyred front?end loader[1] 7.3.8 Additional spoil disposal 1 day Wed 5/2/18 Wed 5/2/18 83 2 cubic metre rubber tyred front?end loader[1] 7.3.9 Unexpected Finds 1 day Thu 5/3/18 Thu 5/3/18 84 Project Engineer 7.4 Demolition Works 20 days Fri 5/4/18 Thu 5/31/18 7.4.1 Demolition of Buildings 7 days Fri 5/4/18 Mon 5/14/18 85 Bulldozer[1], Project Engineer, Structural Engineer 7.4.2 Demolition of Minor Structures 13 days Tue 5/15/18 Thu 5/31/18 7.4.2.1 Retaining Walls (Brick) 3 days Tue 5/15/18 Thu 5/17/18 87 Structural Engineer 7.4.2.2 Courtyard Walls (Brick) 3 days Fri 5/18/18 Tue 5/22/18 89 Structural Engineer 7.4.2.3 Concrete Stairs 3 days Wed 5/23/18 Fri 5/25/18 90 Structural Engineer 7.4.2.4 Light Poles, Light Bollards, log barriers Signs etc 2 days Mon 5/28/18 Tue 5/29/18 91 Structural Engineer 7.4.2.5 Gas Meter Brick Enclosure 2 days Wed 5/30/18 Thu 5/31/18 92 Structural Engineer 8 Project is Closed 1 day Fri 6/1/18 Fri 6/1/18 93 Project Engineer A Budget The estimated budget for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street is shown in the table below, WBS Task Name Cost 1 PRELIMINARIES $21,696.00 2 PROVISION FOR TRAFFIC $5,320.00 3 EARTHWORKS $27,780.00 4 UNDERGROUND SERVICES $63,160.00 5 INCIDENTALS $24,620.00 6 LANDSCAPE $16,450.00 7 DEMOLITION $60,050.00 8 PROJECT IS CLOSED $800.00 TOTAL BUDGET $219,876.00 A Quality Management Plan The quality management plan for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street can be analysed as quality management approach, quality standards, quality assurance, and quality control (Coombs 2014). These points have been explained below, Quality Management Approach: The quality management approach is used for the development of a specific approach for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street and it would form the development of the effective processing and improvement. According to Kim and de Dear (2013), the development of the quality management approach would be helpful for developing the quality management plan. Quality Standards: The quality standards for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street would comprise of using high quality of the tools, techniques, equipments, and other skills for the achievement of the specific demolition of the building and it is developed by following the ACT Standard Specification for Urban Infrastructure Works Edition 1 Revision 0 October 2002 (ACT Standard Specification). Quality Assurance: The quality assurance for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street would comprise of making sure that the project would not harm the environment and surroundings of the site of Goyder Street. Quality Control: The quality control for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street would be developed for controlling the activities of the project so that a specific quality control can be implied. The work health safety plan for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street would comprise of following the guidelines of the Environment and Planning Directorate (EPD) and Environment Protection Agreement with the EPA (Montmasson-Clair and Ryan 2014). The work health safety plan should also abide by the norms of the WHO set for the construction project and it would be reasoned for the development of the specific plan of operations for the management of the health and safety plan. The work health safety plan includes the Safe Work Procedure, Training and Competency, Emergency Plans, Inspections, and Accidents. The safety plan would be formed for ensuring that the activities of the project of site demolition would be done successfully (Martin 2017). The work health safety plan would be formed for the development of the specific analysis of the work and safety plan. A Procurement and Logistics Plan The procurement and logistics plan is developed for various contractors included in the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street such as ActewAGL (Electricity Gas), ICON Water (Water Sewer), Jemena (High Pressure Gas Services), ZNX (Gas services), Telstra (Telecommunications, EPU (soil erosion management, contamination hazardous materials removal disposal), Parks and City Services (Tree removal, tree protection), and ACT Government. The procurement logistics is developed for the development of the potential demand for the development of the specific integration development. The procurement document is formed for the analysis of the specific tools for the formation of the consumption. The procurement planning is made for developing the system for suppliers, prices, and quality of the services (Goetsch and Davis 2014). The terms of the delivery and payment option is formed for the formation of the processes. The key data in materials is formed for the planning of the specific p lan of operation. The logistic plan is formed for the development of the employment of the effective processes and formation. The risk management plan for the project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street would be formed for ensuring that the activities of the project are completed successfully. The risk management plan is formed by risk identification (top three), risk prioritization, risk monitoring, and risk mitigation strategy (McNeil, Frey and Embrechts 2015). The equipments failure is a major factor that would result in forming the issues in the development of the effective processing and formation. The risk management would form the development of the sufficient deployment and analysis of the supplementary development model. The supplementary development of the operations would be implied for the development of the effective system development. The Ref no. Risk Identification Probability Consequences Impact Rank Risk Mitigation Strategy RF99802 Equipments Failure Likely Major Critical 1st Avoid RF99801 Natural Hazards Possible Severe Very High 2nd Transfer RF99803 Change in Climate Likely Moderate High 3rd Accept Contract Management Plan and Documentation Requirements The contract management plan is developed for ensuring the documentation of the contracts with the contractors has been developed successfully. The project of Site Demolition at Goyder Street consists of various contractors like ActewAGL (Electricity Gas), ICON Water (Water Sewer), Jemena (High Pressure Gas Services), ZNX (Gas services), Telstra (Telecommunications, EPU (soil erosion management, contamination hazardous materials removal disposal), Parks and City Services (Tree removal, tree protection), and ACT Government. The contract management is deployed for the development is developed for forming the support of the management (Pritchard and PMP 2014). The contract management includes contract transition planning, contract communication protocol, GFS/I review process, method for monitoring performance-based objectives, inspection and acceptance, invoice review, fee administration, contract change control process, review of contractors requests for equitable adjustments, con tractor litigation management, contractor employee claims system, proposed settlement of costs for post contract liabilities, contract records, and contract closeout. Bibliography Boud, D., Cohen, R. and Sampson, J. eds., 2014.Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. Routledge. Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A. and Rustambekov, E., 2015. Enterprise risk management: Review, critique, and research directions.Long range planning,48(4), pp.265-276. Burke, R., 2013. Project management: planning and control techniques.New Jersey, USA. Cicmil, S., Cooke-Davies, T., Crawford, L. and Richardson, K., 2017, April. Exploring the complexity of projects: Implications of complexity theory for project management practice. Project Management Institute. Coombs, W.T., 2014.Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. Sage Publications. Crawford, J.K., 2014.Project management maturity model. CRC Press. Dunn, C.J., Calkin, D.E. and Thompson, M.P., 2017. Towards enhanced risk management: planning, decision making and monitoring of US wildfire response.International Journal of Wildland Fire,26(7), pp.551-556. Enright, P.T., 2014. Work Health Safety legislation; the fire engineers neglected duty?.Case Studies in Fire Safety,2, pp.1-8. Fleming, Q.W. and Koppelman, J.M., 2016, December. Earned value project management. Project Management Institute. Flyvbjerg, B., 2013. From Nobel prize to project management: getting risks right.arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.3642. Gido, J., Clements, J. and Clements, J., 2014.Successful project management. Nelson Education. Goetsch, D.L. and Davis, S.B., 2014.Quality management for organizational excellence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: pearson. Hegazy, T., 2013.Computer-Based Construction Project Management: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Higher Ed. Heldman, K., 2015.PMP project management professional exam deluxe study guide: updated for the 2015 Exam. John Wiley Sons. Hwang, B.G. and Ng, W.J., 2013. Project management knowledge and skills for green construction: Overcoming challenges.International Journal of Project Management,31(2), pp.272-284. Kerzner, H., 2013.Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley Sons. Kerzner, H., 2017.Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley Sons. Kim, J. and de Dear, R., 2013. Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices.Journal of Environmental Psychology,36, pp.18-26. Larson, E.W. and Gray, C., 2013.Project Management: The Managerial Process with MS Project. McGraw-Hill. Leach, L.P., 2014.Critical chain project management. Artech House. Martin, B., 2017.The politics of electricity planning in South Africa: A review of dominant advocacy coalitions seeking to influence the Integrated Resource Plan of 2010 (IRP2010), and its update in 2013(Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town). Martinelli, R.J. and Milosevic, D.Z., 2016.Project management toolbox: tools and techniques for the practicing project manager. John Wiley Sons. McNeil, A.J., Frey, R. and Embrechts, P., 2015.Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton university press. Mir, F.A. and Pinnington, A.H., 2014. Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success.International journal of project management,32(2), pp.202-217. Mok, K.Y., Shen, G.Q. and Yang, J., 2015. Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), pp.446-457. Montmasson-Clair, G. and Ryan, G., 2014. Repositioning Electricity Planning at the Core: An Evaluation of South Africa's Integrated Resource Plan. Neal, B., 2017. Health and Safety at Work Act 2015: Intention, implementation and outcomes in the hill country livestock farming industry. Nicholas, J.M. and Steyn, H., 2017.Project management for engineering, business and technology. Taylor Francis. Phillips, J., 2013.PMP, Project Management Professional (Certification Study Guides). McGraw-Hill Osborne Media. Portny, S.E., 2017.Project management for dummies. John Wiley Sons. Pritchard, C.L. and PMP, P.R., 2014.Risk management: concepts and guidance. CRC Press. Sallis, E., 2014.Total quality management in education. Routledge. Schwalbe, K., 2015.Information technology project management. Cengage Learning. Sears, S.K., Sears, G.A., Clough, R.H., Rounds, J.L. and Segner, R.O., 2015.Construction project management. John Wiley Sons. Serra, C.E.M. and Kunc, M., 2015. Benefits realisation management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies.International Journal of Project Management,33(1), pp.53-66. Svejvig, P. and Andersen, P., 2015. Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), pp.278-290. Todorovi?, M.L., Petrovi?, D.?., Mihi?, M.M., Obradovi?, V.L. and Bushuyev, S.D., 2015. Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management.International Journal of Project Management,33(4), pp.772-783. Turner, R., 2016.Gower handbook of project management. Routledge. Verzuh, E., 2015.The fast forward MBA in project management. John Wiley Sons. Walker, A., 2015.Project management in construction. John Wiley Sons. Communication Plan